Our benefits
Main Menu
| Home |
| Order form |
| Contact us |
| Blog |
| Home |
| Order form |
| Contact us |
| Blog |
| Questionnaires |
|
As already mentioned, a questionnaire is a research instrument consisting of a series of questions people answer about their life condition, beliefs, or attitudes. A questionnaire can be administered either as a printed document that respondents fill out or as a list of queries posed by an interviewer, who then compiles interviewees' answers either by writing on a printed form or by recording the replies on audiotape or videotape. Types of Questionnaire Items Questionnaires typically contain one or more item types: (a) dual-choice, (b) multiple-choice, (c) short-answer, or (d) narrative or essay. Dual-choice items Dual-choice items offer respondents two options from which to selectyes/no, agree/disagree, like/dislike, approve/disapprove, ever/never. Two advantages of the dual-choice questions are that the items can be quickly answered and the results easily compiled. In research reports, the results are typically reported as percentages--"53% of Democrats favored the welfare proposal" or "19% of students reported that they had never tried any form of alcohol." A further advantage is that researchers can include more items on a two-choice questionnaire than is generally the case with instruments that require more complex responses, as do open-ended questions that call for a narrative answer.One limitation of dual-choice items is that they fail to reveal graduated levels of belief that would be discovered if respondents were able to show where their opinions belonged on a scale ranging from extremely high to extremely low. A second potential disadvantage is that the very ease with which two-level items can be marked may encourage a hasty person to check off answers carelessly without thoroughly considering each item's implications.Multiple choices Respondents can be offered multiple options either as a list of discrete answers from which to choose or as a dimension or scale extending from one extreme to the other. The following are two sorts of discrete answers:Directions: Place an X on the line before the one candidate you would prefer as president of the Rotary Club.
Seven uses have been suggested for spending the money collected in the Kiwanis lottery. Place a I beside the item you think is the best way to use the money, a 2 beside the way you consider second best, and a 3 beside the way you think is third best.
Figure 8-1 illustrates one popular form of a researcher-constructed rating scale, a semantic-differential type featuring diametrically contrasting adjectives at the opposite ends of each scale line. This example displays the first four lines of an assessment instrument designed to elicit observers' judgments of trial lawyers' questioning styles as shown in scenes recorded on videotape. The "favorable" end of scales is randomly changed from left to right on successive lines so as to combat any tendency of participants to carelessly mark the same end of all scales on the basis of the response-set they bring to the task, such as a tendency to generally approve or disapprove of the lawyer in the scene. Thus, raters must study every scale line individually in order to produce a coherent overall judgment of the lawyers' styles. A researcher can later convert the raters' judgments into numerical form for purposes of analysis by weighting the seven spaces form 1 (least favorable rating) to 7 (most favorable rating). Figure 8-1 Trial Lawyers' Questioning Styles Instructions: As you watch the videotape, use a copy of this rating sheet to record your impression of the questioning style of each of the four lawyers portrayed in the court scenes. Place an X in the space on each line that you believe best represents the lawyer's style. First Lawyer Blunt Subtle Fair Unfair Threatening Kindly Serious Humorous Short-answer items This approach requires respondents to offer a word or phrase in reply to a question. One advantage of such items is that they do not restrict people's answers to a set of options presented by the researcher but, rather, they allow people to reply in any way they wish. A disadvantage is that the range of answers may be so diverse that the responses are difficult to classify into categories that are easy to compile and interpret. Yet such diversity may be necessary if people's answers are to accurately represent their opinions and knowledge.Here are two short-answer questions from a study of prison inmates' interests.
Narrative items In contrast to multiple-choice and short-answer questions, narrative items enable respondents to identify in detail a variety of factors that have influenced their experiences and opinions. As a result, narrative responses can reveal the unique patterning of different people's knowledge and attitudes. However, the individualistic nature of narrative answers increases the difficulty of classifying responses into categories that are readily compared. Questionnaire Resources Aiken L. R. ( 1997). Questionnaires and Inventories: Surveying Opinions and Assessing Personality. New York: Wiley. Angleitner J. S., Wiggins J. S. (Eds.). ( 1986). Personality Assessment Via Questionnaires: Current Issues in Theory and Measurement. New York: SpringerVerlag. Berdie D. F., Anderson J. F., & Niebuhr M. A. ( 1986). Questionnaires: Design and Use ( 2nd ed.). Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow Press. Cox J. ( 1996). Your Opinion, Please!: How to Build the Best Questionnaires in the Field of Education. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin. Foddy W. H. ( 1993). Constructing Questions for Interviews and Questionnaires. New York: Cambridge University Press. Labaw P. J. ( 1981). Advanced Questionnaire Design. Cambridge, MA: Abt. Oppenheim A. N. ( 1992). Questionnaire Design, Interviewing, and Attitude Measurement. New York: St. Martin's. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|