The investigation of crimes is impossible without the assistance of professionals who can analyze and study in details the scene of a crime, collect and study evidences which can be found in the scene of the crime. In this respect, the crime scene evidence investigators turn out to be of the utmost importance because they are able to collect all technical evidence in the crime scene and get as much information about the crime committed as possible. At the same time, it is important to lay emphasis on the fact that the current system actually does not provide crime scene evidence investigators to conduct the full study of evidences they collect since they do not always have access to crime labs. As a result, there appears the gap between the crime scene proper and the crime lab because crime scene evidence investigator collect evidence right in the scene of a crime, while forensic detectives actually continue their work in the crime lab.Â In such a way, evidences are not studied by one professional or a team of professionals from the beginning till the end of the examination process. Instead, evidences are studied by at least two persons or groups of professionals ”“ crime scene evidence investigators and forensic detectives working at crime labs.
Obviously, such a situation decreases the effectiveness of the study of evidences collected in the scene of a crime. In fact, forensic detectives working in crime labs do not see the crime scene with their own eyes and they cannot adequately reconstruct the scene to get the full information about the crime. They work with evidences but the information they have about the crime and, especially about the crime scene, is quite fragmentary. In contrast, crime scene investigators examine the crime scene and collect evidence. However, they cannot study and analyze the evidences they collect in details. Instead, they have to send the evidences to crime labs. As a result, they cannot continue the study of the evidences that naturally decreases the effectiveness of the entire process of investigation.
In such a situation, if crime scene evidence investigators are admitted to crime labs they would close the gap between the crime scene and the analysis of evidences they collect. As a result, they would better understand the crime because they saw a crime scene and researched evidences. Hence, they gather and process all the information without any risk of the appearance of communication gaps or some misunderstandings.
At the same time, to be effective in the crime scene and crime lab, crime scene evidence investigators should be highly-qualified professionals who have extensive knowledge in the field of criminology. Consequently, they need special education which creates the basis for their work in the crime scene. On the other hand, they need to train regularly because the technological progress opens larger opportunities for the study and analysis of evidences in the crime scene. Hence, without training, crime scene evidence investigators cannot apply new technologies effectively. In addition, training contributes to the development of professional skills and abilities of crime scene evidence investigators that increase their efficiency and improves the quality of investigation.
Thus, it is possible to conclude that crime scene evidence investigators should be admitted to crime labs to conduct the investigation from the crime scene till the end of the evidence analysis. In addition, they need regular training to maintain their high qualification.