Buy essay on Blindness and insight in “A Doll House” by Henrick Ibsen

The play A Doll House by Henrick Ibsen. As a matter of fact, in this tragedy there is no peculiar to Shakespeare’s abundance of corpses. Ibsen takes the stage, seemingly the most affluent segments of society, but in the course of action becomes clear that society itself is very precarious. Husband refers to his wife as a chrysalis, like the fun, he just did not like that she spends so much money: The bird is very sweet, but spends a lot of money. It’s amazing how expensive to her husband is a bird!, as stated in Literature quotes. Consequently, by making the kind of carefree, Nora is forced to hide her problems, so that Helmer was the same doll and the little bird, which he needs. As a fact, in some sense, Helmer is blind, because he did not see the reality, the real problem his wife is faced. In my opinion, Helmer lives in his own world, where the most important is to have money and do not spend it. As a result, Helmer does not even know the true inner strength of his wife, and when the circumstances reveal that, Helmer is unable to assess his worries only himself. And the fact that Nora decides to leave him, he also perceives not so much as a problem of relations between them, but as a problem that it would be wrong for the society. No certainty that he loves her, no request for forgiveness, even the slightest remorse, nor even understanding what he has done something wrong. All this characterizes Helmer as a blind person: Helmer: First and foremost, you are a wife and mother, Nora: That I don’t believe any more. I believe that first and foremost I am an individual, just as you are, as stated in Literature essay
In A Doll’s House Ibsen captures not only the issue of the complexities of relationships between husband and wife, psychic blindness and insensitivity, but also society, the product and the classical representative of which is Helmer. Nora leaves, because he sees a perfect deadlock. She endured this doll house and was a chrysalis for Helmer only because he thought it a completely different person: I have existed merely to perform tricks for you, Torvald. You and father have committed a great sin against me. It is your fault that I have made nothing of my life. Our home has been nothing but a playroom. I have been your doll-wife, just as at home I was father’s doll-child; and here the children have been my dolls, as stated in Literature quotes. Now she sees that he is again ready to play with dolls as soon as all was settled and nothing more threatening to him personally. It goes nowhere, not knowing what will do next, throws her children because she had nowhere to take them, just ran out of the Helmer’s world. But this world is all around her. She was out of this world but can not escape. Pretty and direct Nora is seemingly quite distant from the problems of public life, come into irreconcilable conflict with this society, calling it inhumane laws. Committing themselves to the bitter discovery that her idyllic family life is nothing more than an illusion and that for many years she worshiped her society imposed a false life values, Nora strongly reconsiders his past and takes a tough decision – to leave her husband and children to alone with him calmly and soberly understand who is right – society or she, as described in Literary analysis: A Doll House, by Henrik Ibsen.
To sum it up, I would like to say that all these classical plays describe us different situations and different consequences. The unifying factor of this plays is human blind, which in different manner inherent to the characters of these plays. However, it should be noted that all of them found the courage to get rid of this blindness and objectively look at the situation. Oedipus blinded himself and opened a new insight to the life, Othello decided that he could not live anymore, and Helmer revised his views and ask for forgiveness from his wife.

Leave a Reply